Sorry I cannot agree anymore.
Here is a end-user's point of view. So don't get me wrong:
I am too lazy to reword everything I talked, so here is a part of the chat.
[17:18:52] ~*McoreD*~: because IE is the most used browser by ppl ,
they find a lot of security holes in it
that doesnt mean firefox do not have them
[17:19:03] ~*McoreD*~: firefox will have plenty but ppl dont know
[17:19:19] ~*McoreD*~: because it is not popular and the news doesnt
come to them so quick as they come for IE
[17:19:40] BrainyNerd: correct
[17:19:46] ~*McoreD*~: so the user of firefox are pretty late for
knowing security patches :)
[17:19:49] ~*McoreD*~: glad u got me
[17:20:03] BrainyNerd: open source as you mention is more dangerous
[17:20:07] ~*McoreD*~: yes
[17:20:11] BrainyNerd: because people get the source to it too
[17:20:37] ~*McoreD*~: hackers know better about how firefox works than they do in IE
Plus;
Download Manager -- as said in the other post, I use FlashGet which has much more features.
Popup Blocker -- I use Google Toolbar, and again it has more features that I want
Not all the applications support every non-IE browser.
An error message (attached) was received from Mozilla FireFox when attempting connect to
http://www.mess.be. No further information was passed to the user and the problem remains unidentified.
The same site was viewed in Internet Explorer and the user was then able to identify the problem. It was a site that was belonged to a category restricted by Norton Internet Security.
And here is another member's PoV:
If FireFox was the most used browser in the world, then people would be looking for holes there instead of in IE6...and then MS's stuff would seem stronger.
I remember a few months ago when the Gentoo Linux project servers were hacked....people are getting sick of open-source in general touting itself as being practically invincible.
Look and you shall find. It's only a matter of time
Which I agree.