|
|
|
|
26th Jun 02, 09:20 AM
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 11
|
|
i've always been happy with fat 32 so never really bothered converting the drives to ntfs, i was just wondering are the speed differences noticeable, and are there any other benifits, thanks...
|
|
26th Jun 02, 09:49 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 871
|
|
Absolutely.
NTFS = New Technology File System...what can it do?
It makes use of your hard drive by way of smaller clusters per track... that in turn reduces hard drive wasted space.
NTFS allows the hard drive to access programs faster.
As for security...fat has none. NTFS has alot.
Want to add a new hard drive to your existing machine, and have it think its extended from the original? No problem - simple volumes allow this in the NTFS. You can extend a hard drive to another and make it appear as one large drive.
There is alot more...but its late and I am sure many others will add to this :-)
|
|
26th Jun 02, 10:00 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 31
|
|
NTFS is great and has a lot of nice features... however, if you machine crashes and you have to boot from a boot disk.... you screwed unless you've got that NTFSDOS program.. not part of the standard boot disk.
For what i need my computer for, just stick with FAT32, unless your running critical systems or over a large network where file level security is important.
FAT32 for compatablility.
what more can i say.
|
|
26th Jun 02, 02:30 PM
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 11
|
|
thanks for the replies guys, shall have a little more look into it now..
|
|
26th Jun 02, 04:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 31
|
|
No Problem, glad to help.
|
|
26th Jun 02, 09:59 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 871
|
|
If a system using NTFS does crash, it can be repaired using either the boot disks you made right after you installed the system, (The first thing one should ALWAYS do when installing an OS) or even easier by booting from the installation cd and allowing a repair.
NTFS in my opinion is a more powerfull and definately more stable way of managing files on a system
|
|
26th Jun 02, 10:17 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Here.
Posts: 261
|
|
If I used Windows (XP) alone, I would also go along with NTFS. However because Linux doesn't have a complete driver for NTFS I'm stuck with using FAT32.
|
|
24th Jul 02, 06:55 AM
|
BetaONE Supporter
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 257
|
|
Several bootmanagers work better when installed on fat32
|
|
25th Jul 02, 04:50 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 485
|
|
if standalone system, FAT32.....unless u need security protection against your family members accessing your important files or data....
otherwise, i would go with the guys on NTFS (although more hassle when system crashes) with the network environment.
|
|
25th Jul 02, 06:44 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,996
|
|
Originally posted by craftyc@Jun 26 2002, 09:17 PM
If I used Windows (XP) alone, I would also go along with NTFS. However because Linux doesn't have a complete driver for NTFS I'm stuck with using FAT32.
Just wondering why you dont partition your hard drive and then dual boot?
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
NTFS - never again* |
daMANiack |
Windows NT/2000/XP (+ Service Packs) |
19 |
14th Sep 02 06:49 AM |
Speed up system. |
greasemonkey |
Hardware Support |
6 |
6th Nov 01 08:32 PM |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 AM.
|
|