BetaONE will rise again!


Reply
  #1  
Old 14th Sep 02, 10:19 PM
tubebuoy's Avatar
tubebuoy tubebuoy is offline
Chopped Liver
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 851
tubebuoy is on a distinguished road
I used Add/Remove Windows Components to delete Messenger. Then I ran Norton Syswrks 2003 'Windoctor'. Rebooted, and the freakin' bastard's BACK!!!!!!!!!

Wonder what the D.O.J. will have to say about this?

}---:?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15th Sep 02, 04:34 PM
Woogieman's Avatar
Woogieman Woogieman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 58
Woogieman
The DOJ won't say anything. After the Bush administration took office, the DOJ was immediately ordered to drop all pressure on M$. The only pressure on M$ right now is the pending law suites by 9 states Attourney Generals. Also, there is an additional large legal action being developed by other states right now because of damages they feel that M$ has done thru their underhanded business practices.

DOJ, though? Forget it, their hands have been tied by their bosses - Donald Rumsfield and friends.



Last edited by Woogieman at Today at 6:35 am
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15th Sep 02, 08:31 PM
SlickVic78's Avatar
SlickVic78 SlickVic78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 515
SlickVic78 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by tubebuoy@Yesterday at 4:19 pm
I used Add/Remove Windows Components to delete Messenger. Then I ran Norton Syswrks 2003 'Windoctor'. Rebooted, and the freakin' bastard's BACK!!!!!!!!!

Wonder what the D.O.J. will have to say about this?

}---:?
Hey tubebuoy,

Technically, you did not uninstall/remove Messenger. All you actually did, and what M$ set up was a way for you to "hide" the programs... Makes no sense to me, but that's what they did... But if that is what they needed to do to comply with the demands of the States... that's what they did and nothing more...

Just saw this post by Fisher, there is a utility that will remove Messenger for you (without having to go through the registry yourself to rid yourself of the pesty prog)... He posted this URL: hxxp://www.majorgeeks.com/getfile.php?site=2&file=2327&gfile=yes Check it out if you want to remove Messenger. There are also other ways to prevent Messenger from ever being used, I think it was through the Policy Editor... Don't remember how I did it, but would be more than willing to find it if you want me to. Let me know.

-SlickVic78



Last edited by SlickVic78 at Today at 2:35 pm
__________________
  • Pentium 4 3.20GHz Processor
  • 1 Gig DDR 400MHz RAM
  • 100 Gig 7200 RPM Western Digital HDD
  • 80 Gig 7200 RPM Western Digital HDD
  • Lite-On LTR-52327S CD-RW Burner
  • Lite-On SOHW-1633S DVD Burner
  • ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
  • Sound Blaster Audigy
  • Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP-2
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th Sep 02, 08:49 PM
rikytik's Avatar
rikytik rikytik is offline
BetaONE Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,051
rikytik is an unknown quantity at this point
Yeah. That's all the new feature does is "hide". And whoopie for Willie. He's got a buddy in the White House. Great!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16th Sep 02, 12:15 AM
Tra_Vuz Tra_Vuz is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9
Tra_Vuz
here's a quick solution to all your problems ... reformat and intall linux and all your MS problems will disappear.

I cannot fathom why people who use MS software complain more than the Linux crowd ... either support it or move to the supposed better alternative. I feel like i'm the only one in the universe that has had no troubles with MS software cuz basically ... i've never run into any of these problems. Plus, with the whole Doj fiasco ... all that was asked from MS was to switch off certain apps so that the user can use third party software ... which MS did. If after using a norton app, MS messenger pops up again ... well that's something norton's caused not MS. So that you know, nothing that was originally installed as part of Xp can be deleted by you the user. I'm sure MS is capable of doing this but why should they, and in the case that you really want it off you sys ... you can use third party software to physically remove it. Plus it is MS's software ... why should they even think of unistalling apps that they themselves created for their OS. Here's the scenario ... as impossible or as stupid as it sounds ... bear with me for the sake of it. It's like this, you take in someone who pays you a good sum of rent each month ... he slowly becomes to comfortable and begins to use areas that should be out of bounds ... though you have never stipulated this to him. One day he decides that he doesn't like your furniture, and then goes as far as getting rid of it because he can't get comfortable. He replaces it with old run down furniture that he had in storage, and which he finds more to his liking, though it is completely incompatable with the color schemes and decor in your home. You catch him, and try to stop him ... he decides to bring you to court, and the court rules in his favor cuz you really never specified in a contract what his boundaries where, and because you have been making him pay a large sum for rent. YOU now have to replace your furniture, and live with third party furniture, and you can't do anything to get rid of this renter ... who is causing you all sorts of problems, and discomforts. How is that fair, considering it is your house to begin with? In the end ... MS did create this OS ... they should have the right to do whatever it is they want with it. In fact ... sometimes i think that they should start charging all these third party appz rent, to use space on their OS, then maybe all this complaining or bitching will come to an end (though I doubt that since it is in peoples nature to complain about everything).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16th Sep 02, 12:52 AM
belthazor's Avatar
belthazor belthazor is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,172
belthazor is on a distinguished road
Quote:
And whoopie for Willie
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16th Sep 02, 01:56 AM
Tra_Vuz Tra_Vuz is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9
Tra_Vuz
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16th Sep 02, 07:45 PM
Woogieman's Avatar
Woogieman Woogieman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 58
Woogieman
Tra_Vuz:

Your analogy is severly faulted. If I had a choice of boarding houses (in your context) to choose from, then you would be correct. BUT, when you change the rules to where you're the only place where a boarder can go, then you can't expect the boarder to live life in a narrow confine that you dictate.

In broader terms: IF M$ hadn't obligated the oems to using ONLY Windows on all their machines - or they lost their contract to use Windows; and M$ hadn't coerced the major software house early in their developement with the same type pressures; and hadn't bought up developing companies that had products that showed potentially greater value - then they wouldn't have so many people down on their case.

Secondly - the larger legal problems for them started initially because of their restrictive contacts, that were declared (by two different courts) to be unfairly monopolistic. You can't simply go out and attempt to control the world through methods that are blatantly illegal (not to mention immoral)!!

What if your local telephone company dictated what type phone you could use, who you could call, and when you could call; simply because they have control of the local market?

In short - GET REAL!!! Broaden your scope for the benefit of mankind, not defend some sleazy jerk's and their lousey business practices!!



Last edited by Woogieman at Today at 9:46 am
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16th Sep 02, 08:08 PM
perry perry is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5
perry
Send a message via Yahoo to perry
Tra_Vuz's analogy does not fit properly. For it to work. Microsoft would be collecting rent only for the furnishings. The renter, person paying the rent, would be putting the furnishings in his/her own house. If the renter did not like the way the furnishings worked together with his/her house then some of them could be safely packed away in order to make room for some of the old furniture.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16th Sep 02, 08:35 PM
Tra_Vuz Tra_Vuz is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9
Tra_Vuz
with all due respect ... i think you missed the gist of this hypthetical situation that i stated. Have you ever rented out a room, and do you even understand the laws the boarder is subjected to. What i stated was nothing ... if not lacking in a better definition of those laws. I have rented out to people ... trust me when i say that if put in that situation, your gut instinct is to make sure that all you do is keep an eye out for troublesome boarders, and you will not hesitate to make sure that they follow the letter of the laws. Let's be realistic ... it is my property, and i'm working hard to make sure i meet my mortgage payments, and that my investment is not destroyed by some immature jerk. Does that make me unfair, and if so ... how? I work hard to keep my home running smoothly, and so ... cuz i have a boarder ... i should allow him to take control cuz he pays rent. No ... he/she respect my property, and accepts those rules or he/she can leave and find someone who is stupid enough to let them control what is not theirs to control. That applies to MS as well ... why should they allow ppl to control something that is not theirs to control. It is their property.

How you see MS controlling the world with software is beyond me cuz obviously i'm missing something here. I mean, are there subliminal messages during the start up process that is making me fork over money or something. They're running a business and buying up softare houses that will benefit them ... somehow all of a sudden that's become wrong. Man, i guess i was actually thinking that that is the way to do things, and exactly how even i would run a big companies. In fact how many other companies have done the exact same thing, and yet not one person is bitching or complaining about these unfair business tactics. In fact, aren't you being just a bit to paranoid here. Sorry to burst your little bubble but they can't take over the world, and there are alot more things that are unfair in this world but for some reason a guy who's a bit aggressive in the way he deals with his customers ... suddenly that affects everybody. How is beyond me cuz that's just it ... it hasn't affected me at all, and as far as Bill Gates goes ... that's just it ... i could really care less. I don't defend him, and in my eyes ... he's the lesser of 2 evils. Worry about Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden ... those are the people with the mad visions of ruling our world, and those are the sick perverted people who will go to great lengths to do it. BIll Gates is a business man, and when it comes to business ... their is nothing unfair about the way he runs it ... i've seen and heard worse. In case you've forgotten, what about Enron and World Com ... i would take working for Gates over those 2 companies cuz at least he's not ripping off his workers, or causing them all to get their collective asses kicked out of their jobs cuz of greed. As for our local telephone company ... they've already put restrictions and applied rules cuz with DSL we are being capped, and those using their service are being forced to pay more, and guess why ... cuz they do control the local market. But guess what, i'm not about to put them down or start a web page condemning them ... nor will i mention their name cuz in the end it's all about running a business, and that's what makes the world go round.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.