BetaONE will rise again!


Closed Thread
  #1  
Old 13th Apr 03, 04:17 PM
Brave01Heart's Avatar
Brave01Heart Brave01Heart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 118
Brave01Heart is an unknown quantity at this point
Hi

I have a query regarding the latest release of "SuperW2K3_AIO_v3" from KY and it is with regards to the expected CRC validation.

OK, I already had downloaded v2 but was unsure on how to carry out KY's conversion instructions so, I managed to download v3 from another source.

After downloading it, I carried out a CRC check and it was VALID with a CRC of:

0x38CD5DF9

I the decided to have another go at following KY's instructions from v2 to v3 and this time I had no problems at all. The ISO was created using CDIMAGE.EXE v2.47. Both ISO's are identical in size but after carrying out a CRC check on the ISO that I had just created using KY's instructions, the CRC was VALID but the AutoCRC signature was:

0xECA4BF9B

Although both ISO's are VALID, I am a bit puzzled why they have different CRC signatures, so which one is correct?

Regards

Brave01Heart
  #2  
Old 13th Apr 03, 06:14 PM
khauyeung's Avatar
khauyeung khauyeung is offline
BetaONE Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 67
khauyeung is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by Brave01Heart@Apr 13 2003, 09:17 AM
I have a query regarding the latest release of "SuperW2K3_AIO_v3" from KY and it is with regards to the expected CRC validation.

OK, I already had downloaded v2 but was unsure on how to carry out KY's conversion instructions so, I managed to download v3 from another source.

After downloading it, I carried out a CRC check and it was VALID with a CRC of:

0x38CD5DF9

I the decided to have another go at following KY's instructions from v2 to v3 and this time I had no problems at all. *The ISO was created using CDIMAGE.EXE v2.47. *Both ISO's are identical in size but after carrying out a CRC check on the ISO that I had just created using KY's instructions, the CRC was VALID but the AutoCRC signature was:

0xECA4BF9B

Although both ISO's are VALID, I am a bit puzzled why they have different CRC signatures, so which one is correct?
I made a slight change in the Release Notes (SuperW2K3.HTM) and in 2 BMP Files before I recompile my v3, and I compiled it with an additional advanced option [-y5] which move the contents of the i386 folder to the front part of the CD. This made the difference in CRC.

In other word, both CRC's (yours and mine) are valid for their corresponding contents and compile commands used for the CDIMAGE, you do not need to reach the same CRC as mine!
  #3  
Old 13th Apr 03, 10:50 PM
Brave01Heart's Avatar
Brave01Heart Brave01Heart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 118
Brave01Heart is an unknown quantity at this point
Hi Khauyeung

Many thanks for your response to my post. All understood and although both images are the same (apart from the CRC) I've kept your v3.

MODS: Please close the thread.

Regards
  #4  
Old 14th Apr 03, 03:46 AM
adams adams is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,124
adams is an unknown quantity at this point
closed at your request.
__________________
Camera Equipment:
Canon 40D & Digital Rebel XT
Canon 500mm L IS USM
Canon 100-400mm L IS USM
kit lens
Sigma 70-300mm APO DG
Canon 430 EX Speedlight
Dynatran Tripod
Lowepro Mini Trekker AW backpack
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:28 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.