Originally posted by MinnesotaKid+Jul 4 2003, 11:41 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MinnesotaKid @ Jul 4 2003, 11:41 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Bob_for_President@Jul 4 2003, 09:42 AM
Spam? No. and not a joke.
It's no wonder this country is in such a quandry. Nobody has any guts any longer. If people took the process more seriously than they do then George Bush wouldn't be president and The economy wouldn't be in the dumps.
Nobody has any guts any longer? Tell that to the families of the troops serving our country to defend your rights and liberties.
I was also unaware that the country is in a quandry. Perhaps you need to learn a little more about macro-economics. There's a thing called the business cycle. It's quite natural for economies to go through ups and downs. Look at how fast the economy, stock market, etc. grew in the 90's. Only makes sense that things would slow up a bit for a while. I, for one, prefer not to have runaway inflation like we did in a couple decades ago. And while many people do suffer in a slow economy, many other positive things do happen. Shit, look at how many millions of people are saving a lot of dough by re-financing their homes at these low interest rates, for example.
Your other point about people taking the process more seriously is a point well taken. I, too, wish that more people voted and do other things to get more involved. But another way of looking at voter apathy is to consider that people are content with how things are. The Democrat and Republican parties are quite similar in much of what they stand for. Sure, there are some ideological differences on how big the role of the federal government in our lives should be, but in so many areas the parties do agree on things.
From your website:
"I would also propose decriminalizing the narcotic drugs"
You really want to legalise narcotics? Have you looked into the human consequences of this beyond the financial aspect of the savings from fewer people in prison. You really want people going down to the 7-11 to buy heroin, morphine, opium. Yeah, could I get a Big Gulp with that herion...
Pot is one thing, narcotics are a completely different ballgame, bro.
It all sounds so cute. Ooh... he's running for president! But the proof is, as they say, in the pudding. Check his web page. Make your own judgement.
MNKid[/b][/quote]
Yes, the country is in a quandry and it is very much due to the voodoo economics of the republican party. It has been proved time and again that giving tax breaks to the rich only puts more money into their bank accounts - not into the economy. Give the tax breaks to the people who really fuel the economy - the middle class. Let poorer people keep all of their hard earned money from day one.
Also, if you haven't noticed, our constitutional rights are slowly being eroded from beneath us. Read the Patriot act which John Ashcroft wants to make permanent.
The CIA and FBI and other agencies have unprecedented rights to tap your phone and even check out which books you borrow from the Library. Yes indeed, this country is in deep right now and we need someone who will not waffle on his beliefs or bow before the special interests. It is time that government for the people by the people was returned to the people.
Decriminalize does not mean legalize. It means helping people rather than jailing them. No, I don't want people walking down to the corner store to get heroin or other narcotics. I also don't believe these people should be filling up our prisons. There are way too many innocent people in our prisons now. Legal drugs should be regulated in the same manner that cigarettes and alcohol are - age restrictions, etc...
One more thing - I am not trying to be cute. I really wish I had a snowballs chance in hell of actually getting on the ballot and winning the election. I think I have the intelligence, the energy and the in your face kind of thinking that is necessary to lead a country. No more of this behind the back dealing that goes on in Washington. Do compromises need to me made? Absolutely, but not at the cost of the people who should be in charge - the average citizen.