BetaONE will rise again!


Reply
  #1  
Old 24th Oct 07, 05:29 PM
Alpine's Avatar
Alpine Alpine is offline
Retired Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Run Forest, RUN!!
Posts: 3,601
Alpine is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Alpine Send a message via AIM to Alpine
Cable vendors could face lawsuits for P2P blocking
May be others like Comcast

WE'VE SEEN well informed speculation by industry insiders that Comcast is not the only cable broadband provider engaged in blocking Peer-to-Peer (P2P) uploads as a "network management" tactic to hold down its bandwidth costs and so increase profits.

Other cable broadband vendors are rumoured to also use Sandvine equipment, which is reportedly what Comcast uses to surreptitiously shut down P2P uploads on its network. Those other providers are said to include TimeWarner and Adelphia, and perhaps more.

If so, they might also end up facing possible future class-action lawsuits by customers or an organisation acting in the public interest, which was mentioned as a likely development at a Cnet bog yesterday.

In that account, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others have tested and confirmed that Comcast is stealthily blocking some P2P uploads. Reportedly it's not only BitTorrent traffic that's affected, but also Gnutella and Lotus Notes, as well as possibly other P2P applications that use similar protocols.

So far, Comcast's PR department is sticking to their story that it doesn't block access to any websites or applications, including P2P services, but merely uses the latest technologies to manage its network. However, a Comcast Internet executive who was interviewed by Cnet was described as evasive and refused to deny that it spoofs P2P session shutdown packets.

A Comcast engineer reportedly told another source that "most users wouldn't even be able to detect the traffic-shaping activities they use without special equipment and training."

Apparently, Comcast -- and maybe other cable ISPs -- think that what their customers don't know, or might suspect but can't prove, won't hurt them... the cable ISPs, that is. They might be proven wrong.

Fred von Lohmann, an Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) attorney, said " based on [our] own testing, as well as what has been reported, it seems clear that Comcast's techniques are bad for its customers and bad for innovation generally."

As to the effectiveness of the practice and the harm it might cause, he said: "It's as though they are throwing a spanner in the works of the Internet, hoping that this will somehow reduce bandwidth usage overall."

There's some thought that such heavy handed network "management" might be unlawful. While the EFF is still studying the matter for now, von Lohmann said it has "already been contacted by attorneys who are considering legal action against Comcast."

Perhaps those lawyers should add TimeWarner and Adelphia, and perhaps other cable broadband providers, to their list of potential class action defendants.

The INQuirer
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flat-Screen Makers Face Patent Lawsuits in U.S. NewsBot NeoWin News 0 14th Mar 05 04:30 PM
RIAA files 750 new file-trading lawsuits NewsBot NeoWin News 0 28th Oct 04 10:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.