How is BootIt NG compared with Ghost...
part 1
...when it comes to backup a NTFS partition?
Environment: I have one computer running AMD XP 1600+ where the XP Pro system partition (the partition where XP is installed) has an overall size of 7.5 GB (GigaByte). I use only 2350 MB of the space. A lot of applications are installed at another partition. The systemdrive is important of course. The system, fonts, settings, office, drivers and other important utils are located here. I use to make backups of the system partition using Ghost quite frequently (for an amateur that is, every second week (at least once a month when nothing "important" happens), then always before trying something that is known or suspected to mess up the system (like a new antiviiri util, anything from Corel or Norton and so on).
Test: I decided to make two runs with BootIt NG (from now on "NG" only) and Ghost 2003 (from now on "Ghost") respectively; A first run where the system partition was backed up to a DVD and a second one but now directing the image to another hard drive. We all know this works quite well with Ghost. In fact it never let me down. NG is new to me.
Procedure: I never really installed NG. You need to install it for using the multiboot and multi-primary partitions features. For making backups it's enough with either making a bootfloppy or a bootcd. I used a bootfloppy. The floppy boots fast. When booted you can choose "Cancel" to install NG and then you are brought to a screen where you have some different options. Choosing "Work with partitions" leads you to the working area for making images (among other things). In my last post I compared the images made from ReiserFS-partitions and by NG and Ghost respectively. Here are the NTFS results.
As mentioned above 2350 MB data out of a partition totaling 7.5 GB is to be "imagined".
NG:
==
Making an image and write it to a DVD: <10 minutes
Verifying the image: >5 minutes
Making an image and write it to another harddrive: <4 minutes
Verifying the image: =1 minute
Image size: 1396 MB
Comments: Quite straightforward. I had to check the helpfile (yes, on the floppy) once. The imagefile can be placed either at a partition (FAT-formatted) or at free space of the harddrive(!). Free space is an area not formatted at all. When done the image shows as a partition of the type "image-file" in NG. Looking at it with the Disk Manager in XP is shows as an "unknown" partition. I don't know that happens when the free space of a drive gets fragmented. Verifying is mandatory but you can choose between a crc-test and a complete byte-for-byte comparision. I choosed crc-testing as that is the only option in Ghost. For some reason the DVD was filled with a total of 4.4 GB of files. There was two different images made, an extra one with the file extension "img". I have to look a little more into that.
Ghost:
=====
Making an image and write it to a DVD: <17 minutes
Verifying the image: <9 minutes
Making an image and write it to another harddrive: <7 minutes
Verifying the image: <2 minutes
Image size: 1368 MB
Comments: After having tried NG I felt Ghost is slow and that was new to me as I always thought Ghost is fast. Everything is relative. I choosed "High" as compression rate, as I laways do.As you can see from the results NG is in fact much faster, while Ghost compressed the NTFS marginally better. This as opposed to the ReiserFS partition in the last post (a file format not supported by Ghost, that will change in coming versions, I'm sure) which NG handled well and Ghost had to make a track-for-track image of. Ghost was run from the harddrive where it since long is installed in the first primary partition (C

and run after booting into DOS 7.
Comments in general: Ghost is proven, polished and for sure better for corporate use with all the possibilites to load computers over networks (among a lot of other features. For th ehome user NG obviously is an interestening option. The most important test is yet to be done. I will for sure soon make something fatal either within XP or Xandros. The restore process will be the topic for next post. I wonder if I'll need a serial or license or something for NG then, this far I have done nothing but downloaded NG from their homesite.
Disclaimer: I may have misunderstood something from the manuals totally, or even not read it. If you think this is the case and that it affects my somewhat randomized hittings of keys here you are more than welcome to correct me.