BetaONE will rise again!


Reply
  #1  
Old 14th Jul 03, 05:41 PM
AnneJay's Avatar
AnneJay AnneJay is offline
BetaONE Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 154
AnneJay is an unknown quantity at this point
Just wondering if there is anyway of squeezing just a little more space out of my 120 gb drive. After formatting it only gives me about 111gb, which is mighty annoying when you deal mainly with large files (avi’s, mpg’s, etc). :

Have tried turning off system restore which seemed to free up some space (never did get it to actually restore anything). Am planning a reformat in the near future and was wondering if reformatting the drive in NTFS, would, by chance, give me any more space. Any other ideas, guys and gals?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14th Jul 03, 06:00 PM
mikeh420's Avatar
mikeh420 mikeh420 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 222
mikeh420
Send a message via ICQ to mikeh420 Send a message via AIM to mikeh420 Send a message via Yahoo to mikeh420
The manufacturer calling it a 120 GB drive isn't quite accurate. It actually only has 120,000,000,000 Bytes, which is about 112 GB. My 60 GB drive has 61,400,000,000 Bytes which is 57 GB. So seeing 111 GB would be about right. NTFS might give you a bit more space, and it's more stable than FAT, but unless you were planning to re-format anyway, it's probably not worth the trouble. Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14th Jul 03, 09:51 PM
freezer121 freezer121 is offline
BetaONE Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 239
freezer121 is on a distinguished road
Yes; my Maxtor 120 reports 122,904.959,216 bytes, or 114GB. Hard disk manufacturers quote the basic bytes and are silent about the conversion which gives you less - but memory makers usually do the reverse ( a nominal 64KB being 65,536 bytes and so on).

Whichever, 120GB is still a biggy!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th Jul 03, 10:50 PM
Alpine's Avatar
Alpine Alpine is offline
Retired Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Run Forest, RUN!!
Posts: 3,601
Alpine is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Alpine Send a message via AIM to Alpine
Just take a look there http://www.betaone.net/index.php?showtopic=21393

Maybe that will answer ur question !!! i hope so !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th Jul 03, 11:13 PM
[SiN] [SiN] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: pssstttt.... behind you
Posts: 186
[SiN]
It all depends on how we define a GigaByte... No one really knows lol, but here is the scoop :P

historial context...
"Once upon a time, computer professionals noticed that 2^10 was very nearly equal to 1000 and started using the SI prefix "kilo" to mean 1024. That worked well enough for a decade or two because everybody who talked kilobytes knew that the term implied 1024 bytes. But, almost overnight a much more numerous "everybody" bought computers, and the trade computer professionals needed to talk to physicists and engineers and even to ordinary people, most of whom know that a kilometer is 1000 meters and a kilogram is 1000 grams.

Then data storage for gigabytes, and even terabytes, became practical, and the storage devices were not constructed on binary trees, which meant that, for many practical purposes, binary arithmetic was less convenient than decimal arithmetic. The result is that today "everybody" does not "know" what a megabyte is. When discussing computer memory, most manufacturers use megabyte to mean 2^20 = 1 048 576 bytes, but the manufacturers of computer storage devices usually use the term to mean 1 000 000 bytes. Some designers of local area networks have used megabit per second to mean 1 048 576 bit/s, but all telecommunications engineers use it to mean 10^6 bit/s. And if two definitions of the megabyte are not enough, a third megabyte of 1 024 000 bytes is the megabyte used to format the familiar 90 mm (3 1/2 inch), "1.44 MB" diskette. The confusion is real, as is the potential for incompatibility in standards and in implemented systems.

Faced with this reality, the IEEE Standards Board decided that IEEE standards will use the conventional, internationally adopted, definitions of the SI prefixes. Mega will mean 1 000 000, except that the base-two definition may be used (if such usage is explicitly pointed out on a case-by-case basis) until such time that prefixes for binary multiples are adopted by an appropriate standards body. "

according to NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) 1 GB = 1 000 000 000 B or 10^9. Microsoft labels the drive as GigaByte, but in fact uses gibibyte - 1 073 741 824 GiB thus loosing about 7%.

So with that said, this is how windows sees your 120GB drive:
(120 * 10^9) / 1073741824 = 111.758708953857421875 or ~111 GigaBytes



Prefixes for binary multiples
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Factor Name Symbol Origin Derivation
2^10 kibi Ki kilobinary: (2^10)^1 kilo: (10^3)^1
2^20 mebi Mi megabinary: (2^10)^2 mega: (10^3)^2
2^30 gibi Gi gigabinary: (2^10)^3 giga: (10^3)^3
2^40 tebi Ti terabinary: (2^10)^4 tera: (10^3)^4
2^50 pebi Pi petabinary: (2^10)^5 peta: (10^3)^5
2^60 exbi Ei exabinary: (2^10)^6 exa: (10^3)^6


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Examples and comparisons with SI prefixes
one kibibit 1 Kibit = 2^10 bit = 1024 bit
one kilobit 1 kbit = 1^03 bit = 1000 bit
one mebibyte 1 MiB = 2^20 B = 1 048 576 B
one megabyte 1 MB = 10^6 B = 1 000 000 B
one gibibyte 1 GiB = 2^30 B = 1 073 741 824 B
one gigabyte 1 GB = 10^9 B = 1 000 000 000 B

*edit*
had some numbers messed up
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th Jul 03, 11:33 PM
unicorn unicorn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 851
unicorn is on a distinguished road
offtopic:

[SiN]? That used to be something else?
__________________
unicorn
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th Jul 03, 11:53 PM
[SiN] [SiN] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: pssstttt.... behind you
Posts: 186
[SiN]
Quote:
Originally posted by .unicorn@Jul 14 2003, 03:33 PM
offtopic:

[SiN]? That used to be something else?
hehe yea, [SiN] used to be Lucky - got tired of the old name :P
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th Jul 03, 12:07 AM
unicorn unicorn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 851
unicorn is on a distinguished road
Ah, that's you Lucky...! Ok, I'll be used to it.

(Now I also see your signature... Ooops.

unicorn /me goes wash my eyes
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15th Jul 03, 01:03 AM
[SiN] [SiN] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: pssstttt.... behind you
Posts: 186
[SiN]
Quote:
Originally posted by .unicorn@Jul 14 2003, 04:07 PM
Ah, that's you Lucky...! Ok, I'll be used to it.

(Now I also see your signature... Ooops.

unicorn /me goes wash my eyes
hehe, I just added that to my sig after you asked... thought it may help for others to know lol
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15th Jul 03, 04:33 AM
Cyberion Cyberion is offline
eh!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,449
Cyberion is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Cyberion Send a message via Yahoo to Cyberion
I always thought that for JUST storage you would go for FATxx. Is the Master File System (¿NTFS?) better for storage files, big or small?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: 120 Gig Hdd *MO* Traders Corner 5 10th Aug 04 11:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.