|
#1 Posted by maz4ruth (65 posts) at 30 Oct 2002 - 22:53
I used Winamp 3 for a while, and in terms of speed it was awful.
I'll be staying put with the lovely Winamp 2 for a while...
Report | Hidden
#2 Posted by oldmusicman (3 posts) at 30 Oct 2002 - 23:19 1 Reply
I've been using Winamp 3 still locks up. When you change something, it disappears. I like it a lot and use it, but it's irritating as hell when it quits in the middle of a song. Winamp 2 works. No problem.
Last Edited By oldmusicman On 31 Oct 2002 - 02:32
Report | Hidden
#3 Posted by Electronic Punk (5416 posts) at 30 Oct 2002 - 23:54
I have used Winamp3 for quite a while, was not an aalphsa use, but switched when it became beta... can't do without it now!
Report | Hidden
#4 Posted by SPeedY_B (938 posts) at 30 Oct 2002 - 23:55 1 Reply
Winamp 3's plain nasty in my opinion
it provides no advantage over Winamp2 and its slow as ever.
Report | Hidden
#5 Posted by geektragedy (4 posts) at 31 Oct 2002 - 01:44
agreed (with 3 out of 4). winamp classic (v2.x) is still the way to go if you want total reliabilty, stability and performance.
WinAMP is getting better
|
Linear Mode
