BetaONE will rise again!


 
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 19th Feb 07, 11:09 PM
Alpine's Avatar
Alpine Alpine is offline
Retired Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Run Forest, RUN!!
Posts: 3,601
Alpine is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Alpine Send a message via AIM to Alpine
Vista security overhaul questioned
User Account Control: insecure by design?


Security researchers have taken issue with Microsoft's implementation of a security feature in Vista that is designed to stop users from routinely running systems in admin mode.

Users of Windows XP and older Microsoft operating systems habitually ran PCs in admin mode, which gives unrestricted access to the system. As a result, malware attacks carried the ability to take over compromised systems which wouldn't normally be possible if a machine was running in user mode.

The User Account Control (UAC) security functionality of Windows Vista is designed to address this problem by obliging users to run their Vista PCs via a normal user account by default. Users are asked to switch modes and enter login credentials when they request a task requiring admin credentials.

White hat hacker Joanna Rutkowska discovered that users attempting to run an installation file need to do so in admin mode. That means users are confronted with the all-or-nothing choice of granting an installed program complete system privileges or abandoning an installation altogether.

"That means that if you downloaded some freeware Tetris game, you will have to run its installer as administrator, giving it not only full access to all your file system and registry," Rutkowska writes, adding that Win XP gave her the ability to add permissions to her normal (restricted) user account that isn't possible with Vista.

Mark Russinovich, a technical fellow at Microsoft, argues in a detailed response that the design of Vista's User Account Control balances security and usability.

Rutkowska acknowledges that Microsoft has improved the security of its operating system with Vista but warns that the security shortcomings of UAC can not be so easily dismissed. "UAC is not perfect [but that] doesn't diminish the fact that it's a step in the right direction, implementing a least-privilege policy in Windows OS," she writes.

Rutkowska takes issue with Microsoft's contention that flaws in UAC controls don't in themselves create security bugs. She points, by way of example, to a security bug she has discovered which allows a low integrity level process to send WM_KEYDOWN messages to a command prompt window running at high integrity level as among the types of problems she is seeking to highlight.


The REGister
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Microsoft: Push the Windows Vista date back NewsBot NeoWin News 0 4th Aug 06 08:00 PM
M$ Vista has security flaws Alpine BetaONE News 0 19th Jul 06 02:12 PM
Microsoft Plans Six Core Windows Vista Versions Alpine BetaONE News 0 20th Feb 06 10:37 PM
Security Updates for IE7 and Vista Beta 1 Available Now NewsBot NeoWin News 0 9th Nov 05 10:00 AM
Neowin Talks Security with Microsoft NewsBot NeoWin News 0 7th Feb 05 02:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.