Originally posted by MinnesotaKid@Mar 16 2004, 12:46 AM
If Microsoft broke the law, they should face punishment. I have used many Microsoft products over the years and have generally been pretty satisfied, but they have bullied other companies too many times. I have no sympathy at all for them. If Microsoft were to dissolve tomorrow, another company would take their place and life would go on.
MNKid
True, but this is not about bullying here. Face punishment for what? Including IE in the OS? Having everything integrated into the OS?
This is about making MS open their code so that other companies can take a look at it. Microsoft has purposefully left their API's undocumented which I suppose is wrong. IMO, that may be a just reason, but still lately I have been feeling that getting MS to open code has been a huge red herring to punish MS for just being popular. I don't see any reason why any company should be forced to open proprietary code unless it has been proven to cause unfair competition and quite frankly, I have never seen this with Windows. I don't see how having IE as part of the OS is unfair competition or any of the other idiotic claims.
I don't think MS should force OEM's to bundle Windows with a new PC either, but truthfully, I don't believe that is the big issue here because I bet 95% of users are probably happy if they get the OS bundled. They want a new Dell with Windows XP already installed with a restore disk so that all they have to do is plug in and go. None of this has anything to do with the home PC market. It is about company X, Y, and Z against Microsoft and the consumer is stuck in the crossfire.
Like I have always said, Microsoft is damned if they do, damned if they don't.