BetaONE will rise again!


View Poll Results: Which Defragmenter you use?
NONE 2 8.33%
Diskeeper 5 20.83%
O&O Defrag 6 25.00%
Other 0 0%
PerfectDisk 2 8.33%
Windows Defrag 7 29.17%
VoptXP 2 8.33%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  #1  
Old 18th Feb 04, 08:17 AM
SlickVic78's Avatar
SlickVic78 SlickVic78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 515
SlickVic78 is an unknown quantity at this point
Hello~

I have searched the forum being I remember this being discussed before, but for some reason I have been coming up short-handed with no results...

I am currently looking into getting a new defragmenting program being I heard there is much more that can be done than using the out of the box Disk Defragmenter that comes with Windows. I've been hearing a lot about Diskeeper, PerfectDisk, and O&O Defrag.

Originally, I was going to go for O&O, but saw a review stating that it was CPU intensive... But then again, I've been hearing mixed reviews on just about all of the programs mentioned...

That is why I turn to my fellow brothers and sisters here at B1 for guidance... It is always nice to get the real deal recommendation from those who actually are using the software - C'mon Bads - I know you have probably used them all... LOL

I am sure that there are probably other programs out there that can very well be better than the three I mentioned above, which I would be more than happy to be informed about...

So, how about some recommendations... Please?

Thanks in advance!
-SlickVic78
__________________
  • Pentium 4 3.20GHz Processor
  • 1 Gig DDR 400MHz RAM
  • 100 Gig 7200 RPM Western Digital HDD
  • 80 Gig 7200 RPM Western Digital HDD
  • Lite-On LTR-52327S CD-RW Burner
  • Lite-On SOHW-1633S DVD Burner
  • ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
  • Sound Blaster Audigy
  • Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP-2
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18th Feb 04, 08:36 AM
~*McoreD*~'s Avatar
~*McoreD*~ ~*McoreD*~ is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,902
~*McoreD*~ is an unknown quantity at this point
Hi there SlickVic78,

I use O&O Defrag V6, the best and at the same time the most user-friendly defragmentation software for Windows XP, Windows 2003, Windows 2000 and Windows NT 4.

I like it because I can "install and forget" about defragmentation. Once the automatic defragmentation is turn on, it detect when the CPU is running idle and start defraging the hard disks. Doesn't take much time to defrag 120GB. I was never tempted to go to Task Manager and see how much it is CPU intensive - so I will have a look at it next time. It is running smoothly over here and haven't given any problems yet.

Cheers,
McoreD
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18th Feb 04, 09:09 AM
kernel's Avatar
kernel kernel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 91
kernel
i use VoptXP for a longtime and i am satisfied with it

Quote:
Fast - When used regularly, it finishes in a few minutes.
Safe - Your disk data is fully protected.
Easy - You can choose manual or automatic defragmentation--daily or weekly.
Powerful - Includes great tools for tuning your system and cleaning-up unwanted trash.
Info: http://www.vopt.com/VoptXP.htm

Download: ftp://vopt.com/pub/VXP_v722.exe

have a nice day
kernel
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th Feb 04, 10:21 AM
belthazor's Avatar
belthazor belthazor is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,172
belthazor is on a distinguished road
Diskeeper all the way.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th Feb 04, 11:08 AM
unicorn unicorn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 851
unicorn is on a distinguished road
None of them.

How often do you need to defrag your ntfs partition? (Honestly, how many around here has ever noticed a substantial slowdown of the system related to fragmented files only?) For a normal user I think two to four times a year will suffice.
There are some options to do this; either buy a third-party defragger as discussed above, use the inbuilt defrag.exe or erase the partition and bring the files back from a back-up.

I use to boot into safe mode (command window only) and from there run defrag. This way a few files normally locked by the OS also gets defragged. (Not very important, I do it mostly for "fun".) Like cleaning the house in the spring, after the summer and before christmas.

Pros: Free, pretty safe, no processes that can slow your machine down, a good feeling of doing something when you finally decide to defrag for some reason.

Cons: The MFT doesn't get defragged by defrag.exe. (But the same goes for some of those utils you pay money for.) An extra boot into safe mode a couple of times a year.

That was for the normal user. What about the hard core abuser and OS maniac then? Well, the same I should say. Probably you often enough rebuild your partitions and move your precious files around anyway.

my 2 cents - as always you decide for yourself
__________________
unicorn
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18th Feb 04, 11:44 AM
poolman poolman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 273
poolman is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to poolman
Personally, I have read in a few magazines and online sources that say the defragger that comes with XP is plenty. I think people tend not to use it because it's "basic" and does'nt have all the flash of the others. Just a thought to save ya some money
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18th Feb 04, 01:29 PM
~*McoreD*~'s Avatar
~*McoreD*~ ~*McoreD*~ is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,902
~*McoreD*~ is an unknown quantity at this point
unicorn is technically very correct. Although I use a automatic defragmentor just for the sake of it and psychological satisfaction, I too join with unicorn to tell you the performance difference I see is: Close to NONE.

I do DVD Backups and create/move/delete 20 Gigs of files almost everyday. So the Hard Disk is fragmenting very frequently.

Although I previously suggested you a defragmentor, (just because, "Not using a defragmentor" was not one of your requirements) not using a defragment is also one of your options.

Cheers,
McoreD

P.S: Attached a Poll.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18th Feb 04, 06:05 PM
Bads's Avatar
Bads Bads is offline
BetaONE Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Quebec
Posts: 1,710
Bads is an unknown quantity at this point
That's true, I have test them all

O&O was a good defrag but not really fast for me.

PerfectDisk is the one I was using for about one year now. But I receive many error message with it

This is why since two days, I'm using the latest version of Diskeeper Pro

This is really new for me so I can't give it a really good opinion for the moment. But Diskeeper takes more CPU usage than perfectdisk

Maybe it is doing a more good job ? I will see in the next few days
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18th Feb 04, 06:21 PM
SlickVic78's Avatar
SlickVic78 SlickVic78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 515
SlickVic78 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by Bads@Feb 18 2004, 01:05 PM
This is why since two days, I'm using the latest version of Diskeeper Pro

This is really new for me so I can't give it a really good opinion for the moment. But Diskeeper takes more CPU usage than perfectdisk

Maybe it is doing a more good job ? I will see in the next few days
Hey Bads,

Please keep us updated with your results!

Thanks,
-SlickVic78
__________________
  • Pentium 4 3.20GHz Processor
  • 1 Gig DDR 400MHz RAM
  • 100 Gig 7200 RPM Western Digital HDD
  • 80 Gig 7200 RPM Western Digital HDD
  • Lite-On LTR-52327S CD-RW Burner
  • Lite-On SOHW-1633S DVD Burner
  • ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
  • Sound Blaster Audigy
  • Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP-2
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18th Feb 04, 07:02 PM
tnc's Avatar
tnc tnc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
tnc
Send a message via MSN to tnc
We use perfect disk right now. It was the newest program out when we got it. I do like it, but when it tells me that I still need to defrag after running the program I have to do an off line defrag. That seems to fix the problem for me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what FTP prog to use?? Jessica FTP Help 21 24th Feb 02 02:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.