*Source: News Blog (News.com) (
http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-975...?tag=nefd.only)
________
*You'd think that lawyers would be trained in the art of correctly interpreting the fine print.
Larry Drury, an Illinois lawyer, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of iPhone (
http://www.cnet.com/apple-iphone.html) owner Jose Trujillo that claims Apple defrauded his client by failing to reveal that the iPhone battery was not user-replaceable, and that it would die after 300 charges. (Thanks, Gizmodo (
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/breaking/...nt-283280.php).)
"This case arises out of Defendants' purposeful and fraudulent concealment to purchasers of its iPhone cellular telephone that they will be required to incur an annual fee of $85.95 as part of Defendants' battery replacement program," Drury or someone at his firm wrote in the introduction to the complaint.
Sounds sinister, but it's simply not true.
More...