"I give you credit for being civil, but it's too obvious that you didn't bother to read the articles."
If I didn't read the articles, how was I able to post my opinions about the bias involved? There was nothing in this title "Republicans plan to cut education funds for military dependents" to indicate that funds were being 'cut' to the school districts. It sounds like funds are being "cut" to "military dependents" does it not? This in fact was not the case.
ALL advocacy groups form for one reason, MONEY! They all want FREE MONEY! Wether it's donations or government hand outs they want money for their causes.
Why else would they form? To sit around and watch each other scratch their butts? And I'm not saying their causes aren't just or nobel, only that it's unwise to assume their "facts and figures"
are accurate or unbiased.
I'm beginning to think you're a socialist in sympathetic vets clothing. If anything is obvious around here it's that you want 'The Rich' to let you decide what sould be done with THEIR money.
"I give you credit for being civil, but it's too obvious that you didn't bother to read the articles."
Sorry M8! If you wanna dance with the tube, you'll have to do better than this.
}---
