View Single Post
  #13  
Old 7th Oct 02, 10:25 AM
~*McoreD*~'s Avatar
~*McoreD*~ ~*McoreD*~ is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,902
~*McoreD*~ is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by rikytik@Sep 22 2002, 02:14 AM
I think they are both good, but my experience tells me to stick to Norton. McAfee has gotten ver commercial and gimmicky in my view.
i agree with that
anyway:
McAfee VirusScan 7 Pro was installed smoothly in windows 98 (my testing environment).
the DAT definition files weren't downloaded without interruption. unlike in Norton, it began not responding and had to restart the update. and the updating is a pretty much slower process than in NAV too
Reply With Quote