BetaONE will rise again! - Why John F. Kerry Sux!

BetaONE will rise again! (http:\\b1.hcanet.com\forum/index.php)

- General Political Discussion Forum (http:\\b1.hcanet.com\forum/forumdisplay.php?f=51)

- - Why John F. Kerry Sux! (http:\\b1.hcanet.com\forum/showthread.php?t=12641)

Just a brief note before the Democratic convention begins. Starting tomorrow you're going to hear about what a brave, heroic man JFK is. After all, he's Viet Namn war HERO! He has 3 Purple Hearts to prove it! But you might like to do a bit of research about "Purple Hearts" before you fall for his line of crap.

Purple Hearts are awarded to those who are wounded during combat. If you run across a mine field to save your bud and don't get scratched, you don't get a Purple Heart. JFK received 3 Purple Hearts in about 4 months! And NEVER missed a day in the field! Now I wonder, how bad were these wounds? One report says he received a piece of shrapnel in the butt from a mortor round he fired at a rock which ricocheted and DEMANDED the doctor wright it up as a "war wound".

Now I don't want to dis ANYONE who severed the USA in ANY war! But it's important to look at JFK's record in congress. He voted against EVERY major defense bill in the last 20 years including the development of the stealth bomber and fighter. When Ronald Reagan decided to go "toe to toe" with the Soviet Union JFK voted to freeze our nuclear weapons programs.

Now, if you're a "peacenik" who thinks France, Germany and, the UN have the best interests of the USA in mind, JFK *is* your man. But if you pay attention to the DNC this week, you'll see JFK claim he is STRONG on defense. In otherwords, he wants you to forget EVERYTHING he has stood for the last twenty years in congress.

The point is, JFK will tell you what you want to hear and then Fk you. Don't forget, while he claims to "relate to the common man" he owns a private jet, rides in SUV's he says aren't his (they belong to my family but they aren't mine) and has a buttler?!?!?!?

In defense of "W", you may disagree with him but you must admit, he hasn't taken the easy way out. He NEVER looked at the "polls" and fed you the shat you wanted to hear.

More from Tube next time :D

}---:)

i am not a bush fan but this guy is the hollywoodies,socialists,and welfare leeches wet dream.

he kissed up to the United Auto Workers Union for their indorsement then drives and in a rolls royce.

_http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040723-111416-8086r.htm

the local newspaper ran a acticle praising him today. "He his the scion of two of Americas founding families". big lie,big lie. his parental grand parents were jewish immigrants from what is now austria. they changed their name and religion after moving to the boston area. french john said he only learned about this 15 years ago,after being asked about the details by a newspaper reporter{i am sure his father never mentioned it to him}. his mother is a member of the english/french forbes family. founding families my donkey.
the reporter more than likely copied the article directly from a dnc handout.

not much choice. vote for a dumbass or a complete phony who has a hard time making up his mind on what to eat for breakfast.
:( :( :( :( :(

Edited live link-TuB

Great post tube! This is the truth. Do your researchand you will find that JFK is one of the most far left (ie - socialist) politicians to occupy a seat in the senate and his voting record copared with his press satements make him among the biggest hypocrites I have had the displeasure of seeing as a candidate for the presidency [of the USA].

Doder, you may be right about Kerry's views and his family, but as far as the choice goes for who to vote for...I think Bush is the obvious choice...and just because he is not the best public speaker does not make Bush "dumb". He is likely to be a far better educated individual than you or I and comes from a family of quite intelligent, well connected and dilligently accomplished people. He went to the best schools and grew up in an environment conducive to his grooming as a politician, leader and eventually president. I commend Bush for his stance on terrorism, his economic policy, and his resolve in all his decisions - including what may have been a bad decison to go to Iraq, but one in which he has NOT backed down from as a bandwaggoner like Kerry would have. A man of character is what America needs and Kerry that is not. I will vote Bush as I urge you to...or if not, vote Libertarian.

Right now I think anyone would look good next to Bush.

The type of person we need in office is the one that will never run.

It's kind of like playing Fear Factor. Your told you can eat this or that and really you don't want either, but you have to pick one. :P

Don't Vote!! I'm not going to. :) Last day of summer classes next Thursday, week from day, we are having a don't vote rally. lol

Most 18-20 do not give a rats donkey. I sure don't. ;)

well, I voted for Bush, and will agree he is one of the biggest bufoons to ever sit in the White House, but I am pretty certain I dont want Kerry in there insted..

check this outl the first video will make you pee your pants..

http://demsextrememakeover.com/

Nice link. Although, the windows media player link came with an error. :o

Maybe Gates don't like the link. :blink:

I used my real alternitive media player. Use yours here:

Code:

rtsp://real.stream2you.com/RNC/RNC07200.rm

Well here's my two cents worth as your neighbour North of the border your President will affect the every day lives of Canadians and how our two Nations do business because of this I pay fairly close attention to American politics. George.W Bush may have started out fairly week after the last election because of the dimpled and hanging chads, but when 9/11 happened he reacted and struck back at the people who were responsible I beleive his actions to such an attack were correct his foreign policy with our country leaves something to be desired but leaders change and how we deal with each other changes as well. He represents Americans before anyone else and such leaders are not found that often. Besides John Kerry purple hearts and his marriage to a wealthy heiress his performance on the issues has not been clear. When a big decision is made it needs to be clear and concise something Senator Kerry really has not been. Anyway you have the ability to decide who will lead your country for the next four years. It would be a waste not to exercise your right to vote anyone who doesn't vote has no right to complain about the government. You are given a chance to vote for your representation in all levels of government. Just a thought in Australia it's against the law not to vote.I guess all I am trying to say is get registered and vote

I guess I lost all respect for the DNC when they turned a senator's funeral (Wellstone) into a political rally, booing those from the "other side" that came to pay their respects. Disgusting :(

Here is an article from one of my favorite writers that sums John Kerry up pretty good:

Quote:

We all know that Senator John Kerry was in the Vietnam war. He repeatedly reminds us of it at every opportunity. He also repeats the great things he will accomplish when he becomes President of the United States. What he says very little about is what he has actually accomplished in the three decades in between.

That is very appropriate because he has accomplished very little in his 19 years in the Senate. Can you name a single piece of major legislation that has Senator Kerry's name on it? Don't be embarrassed if you can't because there is none.

What was John Kerry doing before he became a Senator? He tells us that he was a prosecutor. What he does not mention is that he was also lieutenant governor when Michael Dukakis was governor of Massachusetts.

This is the same Michael Dukakis who ran for President in 1988 while trying to run away from his liberal-left record, and who tried to cover up his typical liberal anti-military bias by being photographed in a tank. The picture looked so phony that it backfired.

This is the same Michael Dukakis who came out of the Democratic convention with a double-digit lead over the elder George Bush in the polls -- until his liberal track record became public knowledge, including his allowing violent criminals weekend furloughs from prison.

John Kerry's track record as the most liberal Senator from the country's most liberal state is likewise being covered up with images and rhetoric. Whether or not history will repeat itself on election day remains to be seen.

It is considered an "attack" or "negative advertising" to tell people the plain truth that John Kerry's voting record in the Senate was ranked more liberal than that of Ted Kennedy. It was not Republicans who made these rankings but a liberal organization as well as a non-partisan research group.

Like Dukakis back in 1988, the Kerry campaign is waving aside "labels" as irrelevant. But "irrelevant" is itself a label -- and one used to avoid confronting the question of whether the charge of being a liberal is true or false.

Liberals are not some new and exotic species. They have been around for a long time and their positions are well known on issues ranging from racial quotas to military policy. That is why so much effort has gone into camouflaging those positions at the Democratic convention and in the Kerry campaign.

What are those issues and what is the camouflage?

Foremost in this age of international terrorism is the issue of military defense and intelligence-gathering. Ever since the days of George McGovern back in 1972, liberal Democrats have been for cutting back spending on the military and on the intelligence agencies.

John Kerry has voted time and again to do both. Now he is among those loudly criticizing the inadequacies of the agencies he voted to weaken.

It is not just a question of cutting money to those agencies. Liberals have also voted to hamstring our intelligence agencies by limiting their scope at home and abroad.

Jamie Gorelick on the 9/11 Commission that is so critical of these agencies for not sharing information was a Justice Department official in the Clinton administration and it was she who forbad the FBI from sharing information with the CIA.

As for taking military action, liberals have been for outsourcing such decisions to the United Nations, where nothing decisive will ever be done, militarily or otherwise. That is what makes the UN so convenient for liberals.

How can such a record of weakness be covered up? By using the word "strong" -- again and again. The Democratic convention was dominated by banners saying "A Strong America." John Kerry used the word "strong" or "strength" a dozen times in his 50-minute speech.

Other speakers at the Democratic convention likewise keep loudly repeating the word "strong." They clench their fists again and again. Jimmy Carter did it. John Kerry did it. Even Senator Joe Lieberman did it. It is orchestrated disinformation.

The big question is: Will it work?

Here is his whole archive for those interested :)
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/t.../archive.shtml

:)

/JD

It's a bit odd to try and belittle someone and then say your not trying too!

Whatever about purple hearts - Kerry volunteered and he went to Vietnam. Did he have people firing bullets at him. Yes he did. Would I go for that no thanks.

To give a present day analogy. It seems obvious that none have us here have decided to run to the nearest Marine recruiter and bolster the troops in Iraq - Why?because we don't want a bomb up our asses.

So I think its time to give people a break who are far braver than us, (such as my brother in Kabala) tapping away on our keyboards.

Another 4 years of Bush. God help us! Well maybe his Bin Laden friends among the Saudi Oil family may disagree with that.