*http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040226/D80V0L480.html

Great, there's goes my morning ride to work.... I start gettting REAL nervous when the govt. starts legislating "decency" and "morality"..... :mad2:

/JD

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The nation's largest radio station chain took shock jock Howard Stern off the air in six markets, saying his sexually explicit show did not meet the company's newly revised programming standards. The move came on the eve of Thursday's congressional hearing on broadcast indecency.

The Stern show was heard on six stations owned by Clear Channel Communications, though it is distributed to dozens of others by its owner, Infinity Broadcasting. It was not immediately clear how long Stern would stay off the Clear Channel stations.

Stern's show has graphic references to sex and regularly includes strippers and pornographic movie stars as on-air guests. The show that prompted Clear Channel to act aired Tuesday and included a man discussing an alleged sexual encounter with hotel heiress Paris Hilton.

On Thursday, Stern told listeners he had been unaware of the move by Clear Channel.

"I could blow my stack. I'm trying to be cryptic," he said. "To tell you the truth, I don't know what's going on. They are so afraid of me and what this show represents."

Stern's suspension was the second time in two days that Clear Channel has acted against a disc jockey. The company on Tuesday fired the DJ known as "Bubba the Love Sponge," whose show drew a record fine of $755,000 from the Federal Communications Commission. The program aired in four Florida cities and included graphic discussions about sex and drugs "designed to pander to, titillate and shock listeners," the FCC said.

Clear Channel's moves are the latest examples of broadcasters responding to pressure from federal regulators and lawmakers who say too much of radio and TV programming has become unsuitable for children.

Executives from ABC, Fox, NBC, Pax and Clear Channel Communications were scheduled to testify Thursday before the House Energy and Commerce telecommunications subcommittee. The committee has recommended increasing the maximum fine for indecency from $27,500 to $275,000.

In response to letters from Federal Communication Commission Chairman Michael Powell, NBC, CBS and Fox outlined steps they were taking to curb indecency. Among them: Airing live programs on time delays, displaying ratings for programs on their Web sites, reviewing standards and practices, launching ad campaigns to let parents know about the V-chip, and reminding affiliate stations they may reject network programming viewed as unsuitable for their communities.


ABC has not yet responded to Powell.

Powell's letters to the National Association of Broadcasters and the four major networks followed CBS' Super Bowl halftime show, which ended with Justin Timberlake exposing Janet Jackson's breast to 90 million viewers.

"True and lasting change will only be achieved if the broadcast community recommits to its public service roots and its tradition of abiding by community standards of decency," Powell wrote, urging a return to a voluntary code of conduct, which was dropped in 1982 under Reagan administration pressure.

Under FCC rules and federal law, radio stations and over-the-air television channels cannot air material that refers to sexual and excretory functions between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children may be tuning in. The rules do not apply to cable and satellite channels and satellite radio.

Dr. Frank Wright, president of the National Religious Broadcasters, questioned how long the broadcasters' concern about indecency will last.

"Some of this hand-wringing in public is from the very people who have brought us a rogue's gallery of shock jocks," said Wright, whose association of Christian radio and TV broadcasters counts 1,700 members.

Officials at Clear Channel announced a new indecency policy Wednesday that includes companywide training, possible fines against DJs, and automatic suspensions for anyone accused by the FCC of violating indecency rules on the air.

Announcing that Stern's show was suspended, Clear Channel said the radio host disregarded the company's effort to limit indecency.

"Clear Channel drew a line in the sand today with regard to protecting our listeners from indecent content and Howard Stern's show blew right through it," John Hogan, president and CEO of Clear Channel Radio, said in a news release. "It was vulgar, offensive, and insulting, not just to women and African Americans but to anyone with a sense of common decency."

Infinity Broadcasting in 1995 paid the largest cumulative fine to date, $1.7 million, for various violations by Stern's radio show.

This goes deeper than decency and morality JD.....freedom of speech is at stake. Register to vote.

Z

Good, hes a faqing asshole. haha

Screw Clearchannel. My prediction is that he'll be picked up by other stations. In a way it's a double edged sword...it's all about ratings.

And Will, many people feel the same as you, but then again, many people just don't get it. (i.e.-the show)

Oh I get it. :P

@JacKDynne

Concerning your comment:

"Great, there's goes my morning ride to work.... I start gettting REAL nervous when the govt. starts legislating "decency" and "morality"...."

Nothing has been changed about broadcasting standards, the govt has just decided to get off its butt and enforce what already exists. However, saying you listen to (and apparently like) Stern, speaks volumes about you.

Tomboy

Tomboy Posted on Feb 27 2004, 01:35 PM
@Tomboy - If this comment was ment to be negative towards JacKDynne then that speaks volumes about you. :)

@ Tomboy

You can characterize someone by what radio program they listen to? You should market that ability :lol: :(

Whatever happened to freedom of speech and freedom of expression?? Ya really want the government to have that kind of power?


Maybe you could come to my house on Monday morning and turn Howard off on my radio(he is still on infinity radio stations)...lmfaoay :lol:

Zo

and that came from your keyboard.....

all your post end with lmgdao or lmgdaoay in these kinds of posts, even when gsd was zonko.
its not just about freedom of speech and freedom of expression but also about respecting someone's opinion. you can't seem to respect someones opinion when its not the same opinion you have. that speaks a volume about you.

and thats a shame, since you seem like an intelegent person.....

this was not without a reason.

@Tomboy-While being entitled to your opinion is your right, and is even your right to voice it here, you're remark is very inflamatory and totally judgemental. So let's please not cross that line here. ;)

And I'm not ashamed to say, I love listening to the show whenever I can. So if that lumps me into the same catagory as JD, I guess that's not so bad after all. I have alot of respect for him as a friend and "coworker".

What you seem to be missing Tomboy is that "what already exists" is not defined in black and white and is left to interpretation. My point is who defines what "decency" or obscenity is? And what makes their view more valid than mine or anyone elses? What is to stop someone (in power) from claiming that someone elses views (not in power) are indecent and immoral and therefore illegal? It's a very thin line to walk and the fact that government is doing it is even more scary... when will the "filters" start applying to internet use? I mean, children have access to computers, right? So let's filter the net in the name of "protection" right? Hello my friends in Red China ;)

Sheesh.......and to try to take a potshot at me because my views may be different than yours is not a very tolerant way of going through life - I wish you luck :)

/JD

Still, who gives a damn!!!! haha :P

@JacKDynne

I apologize for my troll-like post earlier. I had just read the comments below about Stern and it made me wonder why anyone would willingly listen to such a vile person. I'll try to be more sensitive in my future posts. (and I am sure both you and belthazor are really great guys since you hangout at B1 :gathering: )

Tomboy

-=-=-=-=-

_http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37326

Good riddance to Stern

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 27, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com


Howard Stern is a filthy, profane, vulgar, obscene disgusting pig.

He shouldn't be on the radio. He should be in the zoo.

Three cheers for Clear Channel Communication's decision to pull his show off the air temporarily. It's late, after all these years of smut-peddling on the radio, but the decision should be applauded.

It's a smart move. It's the right thing to do. It's a good business decision. Anyone who believes in right and wrong ought to know that a slimebucket like Stern has no place on the public airwaves.

In good conscience, I can't even describe adequately what Stern said on his program that got him suspended. All I will say is it had to to with the "n" word, anal sex, the size of certain parts of the male anatomy, etc. You get the idea ? the usual Howard Stern, over-the-top, shock-jock antics.

-=-=-=-=-

Ah....variety is the spice of life :)

And danke for the apology as well :)

/JD

Thank you for the apology Tomboy. :)

well, I listen to stern daily, watch his proggie on the E channel, so i guess I am part of the same group of fools|!!!
proud to be associated with JD, Belt, and anyone else who watches it!

as u said Tomboy, everyone has the right to their own opinion, but we don't allow or condone flaming or bashing here..

and, its nothing more than a fricken radio show, not a statement on our culture, beliefs or anything else..just pure, entertainment, for those that want to listen..

like everything else on tv,radio, or whereever, if you dont like it, just flip the channel!!


wase4711

All,

I would like to offer a fuller reasoning for my first post without coming across as a troll. Most of you may be familar with the quaint saying "Birds of a feather flock together". Over the years I have personally observed that this is quite true. People with similar beliefs, passions and character do indeed gather together to enjoy the company of their like-minded friends. Regrettably, not all those who are like-minded are "good" people. Therefore, you have gangs in some cities who rule and terrorize certain areas as well as fight and kill other gangs who invade their turf. Similarly, you have groups like neo-natzis and skin-heads who like one another, but despise and hate other groups of people. Which brings us to the point of what I wanted to say.... it would be disingenuous for any rational person to argue that Howard Stern represents a man with high values and character that we should strive to emulate. His vulgar and obscene personality that he unashamedly flouts on his show do nothing to improve and enrich our society (not even as comedy). I contend that those who freely choose to associate with Stern by listening to his program must share to some degree his character and values. I challenge those of you who say you enjoy Stern's show to look inwardly at yourself and honestly evaluate whether or not you share Stern's values and character. If you do and are proud of it then don't be surprised if others who find Stern to be a rotten person will include you with him.

Please note that no hateful or ugly words were used in this flame free post.

Tomboy
(now putting on asbestos underwear)

I respect the way you made your post and I will be back with an edit to finish what I have to say after I type it up. :D

Edit - I also listen to and watch Howard Stern at differnt times. I also enjoy listening to the Bob & Tom show. They have a web site:

Code:

---

www.bobandtom.com

---

Just because I might agree with you Tomboy on some issues don't mean I agree with all that you say or all of your values, much like Howard Stern.

who cares about Howard Sterns "values or character"?
I only listen to him because he makes me laugh; I don't over-analyze his thought processes or what he stands for. I happen to enjoy him because some of his remarks are similar to how I feel about certain issues....
as far as his character or values, since neither you nor I know him personally, its pretty judgemental to draw conclusions about that stuff..

once again, any one who isn't amused by his comments needs only to move the radio dial to a different postion..

And tomboy, even though I don't concur with the conclusions you draw, your method of expressing your feelings is perfectly allowable here..

One of the best things about this board is the diversity of options that are always expressed here!

Umm...from what I have read, I would not put that stuff anywhere NEAR my nether region if I was you :D :D :D

As for the rest - take care m8 - to each their own, live and let live :)

/JD