![]() |
Never has one breast caused so much outrage. The unveiling of singer Janet Jackson's right breast during Sunday's Super Bowl halftime show in Houston has been the subject of a lot of Monday-morning cooler talk, from the beer-guzzling viewers at home all the way to the top of the Federal Communications Commission.
![]() Some people were furious that CBS and MTV, which produced the halftime entertainment, would expose America to "obscenity" on national television (even though Jackson's breast was partly obscured by a sun-shaped, metal decoration). Code:
http://news.google.com/url?ntc=0M0B0&q=http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Feb/02032004/utah/135241.asp |
10 Users already said Thank You!
GSD, Hunted, Shiromagius, belthazor, derfy, mikeh420, RadiationBoy, dalebleh, PcDad, I_R_lectrishun, |
|
Ya I never knew when I cought the video on my PC that this thing would be talked about so long. Of course, not to mention the FCC getting in it. Guess that's their job.
I heard TiVo said that's been their all time high requested playback ever. :P Edit - See Below: Quote:
Code:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=34&tmpl=fc&in=Entertainment&cat=Super_Bowl_Halftime_Show |
Oh, my. The accidental uncovering of a small part of Janet's right breast, filmed from a relatively large distance, and visible on TV for maybe 120ms... What unimaginable filth! How offensive! It's so unlike the video clips MTV usually airs in which women are always fully clothed with no flesh showing whatsoever ;)
Seriously... there is an *uproar* over THIS? Something which people have to rewind and take framegrabs to notice, and even then it's hardly pornographic. I'm sure millions will have their minds warped by those few pixels visible for one or two NTSC frames. Let the complaints, investigations, angry phonecalls, resignations, and appologies commence. |
It will probably do her *career* some good :D
|
Quote:
|
...and now:
(CBS/AP) Janet Jackson apologized Monday for an incident in which one of her breasts was bared for a moment as she sang with Justin Timberlake during the Super Bowl halftime show Sunday night. In a statement released Monday night, Jackson said it was a last-minute stunt that went awry. Code:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/02/03/entertainment/main597813.shtml |
lol I just think its funny!!!
|
This stunt was clearly staged. As far as why is it a big deal....unlike in Europe, the US does not permit nudity (partial or full) during standard broadcasts, especially during prime time when children may be watching. While the actors themselves may not be penalized for this crass and ill advised act, CBS who carried the broadcast can expect to be paying millions of $ in fines. Compared to porn, JJs exposure is inconsequential (perhaps not even interesting), however, compared to current TV decency standards, it is unquestionably unacceptable. None-the-less, both JJ and Justin will become likely become highly sought after for interviews over next next few weeks. Regrettably, it has probably helped their careers instead of shaming them.
Tomboy |
Here is my take on the subjest her new album was about to hit and it kept the media off her brother Michael maybe I am seeing things wrong but in 2 ways it helped
1.) We all know SEX sells so that is her selling herself for her new album and 2.) Her Brother Michael was not mentioned for at least since Sunday. that is my 2 cents worth |
Funny how the Victorian double standard has created such a big deal out of mamary glands.
|
Quote:
I heard from a friend of mine that his kids did not even blink an eye regarding this halftime incident *until* daddy started rewinding the clip over and over again. ;) Then they started to boggle. It just goes to show that there IS no problem until we create it. So why be all uptight about a boob? It's not a sex organ for god sakes anywhere practically except here in the ole USA. :) |
i wanna see the second boob!!
|
Here you have another pic of the famous Janne Jackson :D :D :D
Edit: @IB - Funny picture, I saved it. Although, we can't host that attachment here. If you find a link to that picture somewhere, maybe you could post that using the hide feature and issue a warning first. We don't want to offend anyone or get anyone in trouble that logs in from work. :D |
Dispite all of Justin's explanation to cover the whole thing up(sorry to all Justin lovers) i think it was all planned and he knew what he was doing the whole time. :lol: just because his latest album went down the dump..... Yes and y should Janet have to say sorry....i think it is all Justin's falt.
Note:Views may be different on the topic but i do agree it was NICE B) |
Here you have the "funny picture" once more . the one that was edited by our moderator :D
WARNING: be careful you dont have anyone behind your back when opening this awesome pic :lol: :lol: :lol: [hide]http://www.b0g.org/wsnm/uploads/superbowl2005.jpg [/hide] Cheerz IB |
oh, alright
|
that was funny
|
LMAO.......I guess I don't want to walk through Janet's garden after all. :o
|
A bit hypocrit,isn't it?All that commotion for a tit.....check the internet,and the subscribers to:"sexy teens","barely legal","enlarge your penis"websites....if you ping the ip's,you almost always end up in the good ol' USA......no offence intended....;)
|
Quote:
Most Americans are still in the "sexuality closet" as well :P DOH! I think I'm gonna have to rent a lesbian porn to erase THAT picture from my memory... :lol: |
Quote:
According to the picture that IB posted,I think it's Michael,instead of Janet... :D :lol: |
Quote:
[hide]http://www.bakla.net[/hide] |
Quote:
Photoshop experiment?.....Please,say yes,otherwise you turn my world upside down.. :lol: |
Quote:
|
I feel used........
|
Quote:
|
thanks you.
|
I want to see them please :D
|
Plus you can't even see the nipple. All you can see is that tit-ring thing :angry:
|
You must be looking at the wrong picture.
I see nip! :P |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.