Haven't done poster printing, but I've owned Epson, Canon and HP's. HP always gave me the sense of quieter more reliable functioning. I do a lot of 4x6 photo printing with my 970C and find it excellent.

HP ALL THE WAY-I WORK ON THIS STUFF EVERY DAY-HOSERRED-YOU ARE CORRECT - PRINTHEADS CLOG EVENTUALLY-THEN YOUR TOSSING YOUR EPSON OR CANON IN THE TRASH :D



Last edited by Dell_928 at Today at 12:21 am

If you check some of the online reviews I think that you will agree that the Epson is by far the best. I have an Epson Photo 870 and couldn't be more pleased. I print a lot of photos and as already noted a big part of a quality print is the paper. I've found with Epson you are better off with their paper. With a 2 meg camera I can print 8x10s that look as good at any regular picture. B)

I totally agree unless you have had experience with an epson then you're in for a whole new exeprience it is just to messy when you have to clean the print heads on an epson with hp just replace the cartridge and you get a whole new print head that is the reason why the hp ink cartridge is a little moore on the expensive side because the ink cartridge is integrated into print head so go HP Dude

HP is king when it comes to printers. Epson is cheaper both with price and quality!